Hello Team, i have two questions to put across;
- During calibration, how precise should the AWY results be? A case in point, I have annual realised supply volume at 3,270,677,117m3 and the river discharge volume for a hydropower plant at 4,535,507,520m3.
- Copied from userguide, “Outputs in the per_pixel folder can be useful for intermediate calculations but should NOT be interpreted at the pixel level, as model assumptions are based on processes understood at the subwatershed scale”.
If I lay the wateryield output per pixel raster over the LULC raster in QGIS using “raster layer zonal statistics”, I get the wateryield output for each LULC class per pixel. This helps me determine how much each LULC class contributes to wateryield. Does it make sense to interprete these results following the warning in the userguide?