Hey all, I try to set the correct TFA value based on sattelite data and a shapefile I have on existing drainages in the area. The area of interest is the Pantanal, which is a very flat, floodplain-like landscape. One would say that this suits a higher TFA (>1000) because it regards floodplains rather than a landscape of narrow streams. However, using lower TFA values (<1000) provides streams_map outputs (Sediment model) that are better corresponding with aforementioned sattelite data and drainages shapefiles. It seems like generally, lower TFA values give a more detailed stream network.
Iām also uncertain whether the drainage map provided includes year-round streams or gullies that are dry for a period every year. Do the stream maps provided by the model only count pixels as streams when it contains water year-round or also periodically?
Does anyone have experience in determining a TFA value, and would you recommend me to use high values (because of the nature of the landscape) or low values (because of the correspondance of the generated stream map with data)