Recreation: holes in output data and polygon percent coverage > 100%

Hi @swolny,

I also confirmed that the Parks layer has some overlapping polygons and the area of overlap is being counted once for each polygon, inflating those area metrics. I’ve filed an issue to fix that bug. In the future we can “union” those predictor polygons before computing the area that intersects with the AOI cell.

As for the holes in the PUD result, I’m not able to reproduce that. I think it comes down to the map symbology. Those missing areas appear to have PUD values greater than the upper bound in your legend.