The log shows that Values in the LULC raster were found that are not represented under the ‘lucode’ column of the Biophysical table. The missing values found in the LULC raster but not the table are: [15]
But there is not [15] in the LULC raster.Please help me figure it out.
Hi @fiona , sometimes the raster values are not obvious - a value of 15 could be hiding somewhere. You could try a “reclassify” from 15 to something else, or a raster calculator conditional to find values in the raster equal to 15.
Okay, looking at your raster, there are many 15s all around the outside of the watershed. Probably 15 should be assigned as the NoData value. Right now NoData is set as 0, but I don’t think there any 0s in the raster.